<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: London 2012 Design Roster</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.yourprojector.com/2009/03/london-2012-design-roster/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.yourprojector.com/2009/03/london-2012-design-roster/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 18:08:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tiredmouse</title>
		<link>http://blog.yourprojector.com/2009/03/london-2012-design-roster/comment-page-1/#comment-1236</link>
		<dc:creator>Tiredmouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 13:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.yourprojector.com/?p=229#comment-1236</guid>
		<description>Lulu dueting with X factor winner Leona Lewis is quite a scary thought!! Surely the quality of work is a safer bet than picking someone randomly?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lulu dueting with X factor winner Leona Lewis is quite a scary thought!! Surely the quality of work is a safer bet than picking someone randomly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dom</title>
		<link>http://blog.yourprojector.com/2009/03/london-2012-design-roster/comment-page-1/#comment-451</link>
		<dc:creator>dom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.yourprojector.com/?p=229#comment-451</guid>
		<description>They had to pitch? I thought they just drew it out of a hat! 
I realise the process companies have to go through is arduous. It seems unfair that the people who have taken part in the tender don&#039;t have a fair chance. From what I&#039;ve read they&#039;re still picking them randomly at the end of the day and not judging the companies on talent alone. I know it won&#039;t dissapoint anymore than only slightly, the print work will undoubtedly be great. I&#039;m sure like myself you don&#039;t want to be beleaguered by a rampant cliché-fest. I find it hard to believe our opening ceremony will out match that which we have saw last year in Beijing. Although I did notice some work for 2012 by Universal Everything, I hope they give Matt Pyke free reign!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They had to pitch? I thought they just drew it out of a hat!<br />
I realise the process companies have to go through is arduous. It seems unfair that the people who have taken part in the tender don&#8217;t have a fair chance. From what I&#8217;ve read they&#8217;re still picking them randomly at the end of the day and not judging the companies on talent alone. I know it won&#8217;t dissapoint anymore than only slightly, the print work will undoubtedly be great. I&#8217;m sure like myself you don&#8217;t want to be beleaguered by a rampant cliché-fest. I find it hard to believe our opening ceremony will out match that which we have saw last year in Beijing. Although I did notice some work for 2012 by Universal Everything, I hope they give Matt Pyke free reign!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan</title>
		<link>http://blog.yourprojector.com/2009/03/london-2012-design-roster/comment-page-1/#comment-450</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.yourprojector.com/?p=229#comment-450</guid>
		<description>You have to question why they&#039;d ask someone to pitch then pick the winner at random, surely the best pitch / most suitable portfolio wins?

I&#039;m not sure how they conducted their search in previous Olympics but it all seems, well, very British doesn&#039;t it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have to question why they&#8217;d ask someone to pitch then pick the winner at random, surely the best pitch / most suitable portfolio wins?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure how they conducted their search in previous Olympics but it all seems, well, very British doesn&#8217;t it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://blog.yourprojector.com/2009/03/london-2012-design-roster/comment-page-1/#comment-449</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.yourprojector.com/?p=229#comment-449</guid>
		<description>Dominic the companies on the roster have all had to pitch for the chance to be there. Its quite a tough pitching process. im sure the work wont dissapoint you when it is unveiled  leading up to 2012. I hope not anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dominic the companies on the roster have all had to pitch for the chance to be there. Its quite a tough pitching process. im sure the work wont dissapoint you when it is unveiled  leading up to 2012. I hope not anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

